4.7 Review

LSD: Lyman-break galaxies Stellar populations and Dynamics - I. Mass, metallicity and gas at z similar to 3.1 star

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 398, Issue 4, Pages 1915-1931

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15185.x

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: starburst

Funding

  1. Italian Space Agency [ASI-INAF I/016/07/0]
  2. INAF CRAM [1.06.09.10]
  3. NASA (Spitzer) [1343503]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first results of a project, Lyman-break galaxies Stellar populations and Dynamics (LSD), aimed at obtaining spatially resolved, near-infrared (IR) spectroscopy of a complete sample of Lyman-break galaxies at z similar to 3. Deep observations with adaptive optics resulted in the detection of the main optical lines, such as [O ii] lambda 3727, H beta and [O iii] lambda 5007, which are used to study sizes, star formation rates (SFRs), morphologies, gas-phase metallicities, gas fractions and effective yields. Optical, near-IR and Spitzer/Infrared Array Camera photometry are used to measure stellar mass. We obtain that morphologies are usually complex, with the presence of several peaks of emissions and companions that are not detected in broad-band images. Typical metallicities are 10-50 per cent solar, with a strong evolution of the mass-metallicity relation from lower redshifts. Stellar masses, gas fraction and evolutionary stages vary significantly among the galaxies, with less massive galaxies showing larger fractions of gas. In contrast with observations in the local universe, effective yields decrease with stellar mass and reach solar values at the low-mass end of the sample. This effect can be reproduced by gas infall with rates of the order of the SFRs. Outflows are present but are not needed to explain the mass-metallicity relation. We conclude that a large fraction of these galaxies is actively creating stars after major episodes of gas infall or merging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available