4.7 Review

Gravitational waves from scattering of stellar-mass black holes in galactic nuclei

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 395, Issue 4, Pages 2127-2146

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14653.x

Keywords

black hole physics; gravitational waves; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: nuclei

Funding

  1. OTKA [68228]
  2. Polanyi Program of the Hungarian National Office for Research and Technology (NKTH)
  3. NASA [NNX08AL43G]
  4. FQXi
  5. Harvard University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stellar-mass black holes (BHs) are expected to segregate and form a steep density cusp around supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in galactic nuclei. We follow the evolution of a multimass system of BHs and stars by numerically integrating the Fokker-Planck energy diffusion equations for a variety of BH mass distributions. We find that the BHs 'self-segregate', and that the rarest, most massive BHs dominate the scattering rate closest to the SMBH(less than or similar to 10(-1) pc). BH-BH binaries form out of gravitational wave emission during BH encounters. We find that the expected rate of BH coalescence events detectable by Advanced LIGO is similar to 1-10(2) yr(-1), depending on the initial mass function of stars in galactic nuclei and the mass of the most massive BHs. We find that the actual merger rate is likely similar to 10 times larger than this due to the intrinsic scatter of stellar densities in many different galaxies. The BH binaries that form this way in galactic nuclei have significant eccentricities as they enter the LIGO band (90 per cent with e > 0.9), and are therefore distinguishable from other binaries, which circularize before becoming detectable. We also show that eccentric mergers can be detected to larger distances and greater BH masses than circular mergers, up to similar to 700M(circle dot). Future ground-based gravitational wave observatories will be able to constrain both the mass function of BHs and stars in galactic nuclei.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available