4.7 Article

Discovery of large-scale gravitational infall in a massive protostellar cluster

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15890.x

Keywords

astrochemistry; stars: formation; ISM: kinematics and dynamics; ISM: molecules; infrared: ISM; radio lines: ISM

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [15071205]
  2. School of Physics at the University of Sydney and through NSF [AST-0645412]
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  4. QEII [DP0557850]
  5. Nagoya University and research
  6. Global COE programme 'Quest for Fundamental Principles in the Universe
  7. Particles to the Solar System and the Cosmos',
  8. MEXT, Japan
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15071205] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report Mopra Australia Telescope National Facility (ATNF), Anglo-Australian Telescope and Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment observations of a molecular clump in Carina, BYF73 = G286.21+0.17, which give evidence of large-scale gravitational infall in the dense gas. From the millimetre and far-infrared data, the clump has a mass of similar to 2 x 104 M-circle dot, luminosity of similar to 2-3 x 104 L-circle dot and diameter of similar to 0.9 pc. From radiative transfer modelling, we derive a mass infall rate of similar to 3.4 x 10-2 M-circle dot yr-1. If confirmed, this rate for gravitational infall in a molecular core or clump may be the highest yet seen. The near-infrared K-band imaging shows an adjacent compact H ii region and IR cluster surrounded by a shell-like photodissociation region showing H-2 emission. At the molecular infall peak, the K imaging also reveals a deeply embedded group of stars with associated H-2 emission. The combination of these features is very unusual, and we suggest that they indicate the ongoing formation of a massive star cluster. We discuss the implications of these data for competing theories of massive star formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available