4.7 Article

Fragmentation in molecular clouds and its connection to the IMF

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 396, Issue 2, Pages 830-841

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14794.x

Keywords

stars: formation; stars: luminosity functions, mass function; ISM: clouds; ISM: structure

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KL 1358/5]
  2. Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) SFB 439
  3. Galaxien im fruhen Universum
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G001987/1, PP/D000890/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [PP/D000890/1, ST/G001987/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analysis of star-forming gas cores in a smooth particle hydrodynamics simulation of a giant molecular cloud. We identify cores using their deep potential wells. This yields a smoother distribution with clearer boundaries than density. Additionally, this gives an indication of future collapse, as bound potential cores (p-cores) represent the earliest stages of fragmentation in molecular clouds. We find that the mass function of the p-cores resembles the stellar initial mass function and the observed clump mass function, although p-core masses (similar to 0.7M(circle dot)) are smaller than typical density clumps. The bound p-cores are generally subsonic, have internal substructure and are only quasi-spherical. We see no evidence of massive bound cores supported by turbulence. We trace the evolution of the p-cores forward in time, and investigate the connection between the original p-core mass and the stellar mass that formed from it. We find that there is a poor correlation, with considerable scatter suggesting accretion on to the core is dependent on more factors than just the initial core mass. During the accretion process the p-cores accrete from beyond the region first bound, highlighting the importance of the core environment to its subsequent evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available