4.7 Article

A photometric study of the field around the candidate recoiling/binary black hole SDSS J092712.65+294344.0

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 397, Issue 1, Pages 458-466

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14945.x

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: photometry; quasars: individual: SDSS J092712; 65+294344; 0

Funding

  1. The Ohio State University
  2. MDM consortium
  3. NSF [AST-9605012, AST-0079523]
  4. NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Data
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a photometric far-ultraviolet (FUV) to K(s)-band study of the field around quasar SDSS J092712.65+294344.0. The SDSS spectrum of this object shows various emission lines with two distinct redshifts, at z = 0.699 and 0.712. Because of this peculiar spectroscopic feature, this source has been proposed as a candidate recoiling or binary black hole. A third alternative model involves two galaxies moving in the centre of a rich galaxy cluster. Here, we present a study addressing the possible presence of such a rich cluster of galaxies in the SDSS J092712.65+294344.0 field. We observed the 3.6 x 2.6 arcmin(2) field in the K(s) band and matched the near-infrared data with the FUV and near-ultraviolet images in the Galaxy Evolution Explorer archive and the ugriz observations in the SDSS. From various colour-colour diagrams, we were able to classify the nature of 32 sources, only 6-11 of which have colours consistent with galaxies at z approximate to 0.7. We compare these numbers with the surface density of galaxies, stars and quasars and the expectations for typical galaxy clusters both at low and high redshift. Our study shows that the galaxy cluster scenario is in clear disagreement with the new observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available