4.7 Article

Building a control sample for galaxy pairs

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 397, Issue 2, Pages 748-756

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15033.x

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: interactions; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas
  2. AGENCIA [Pict 32342 (2005), Pict 245 (2006)]
  3. European Union's ALFA-II
  4. Latin American European Network for Astrophysics and Cosmology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several observational works have attempted to isolate the effects of galaxy interactions by comparing galaxies in pairs with isolated galaxies. However, different authors have proposed different ways to build these so-called control samples (CS). By using mock galaxy catalogues of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 4 buildup from the Millennium Simulation, we explore how the way of building a CS might introduce biases which could affect the interpretation of results. We make use of the fact that the physics of interactions are not included in the semi-analytic model, to infer that any difference between the mock control and pair samples can be ascribed to selection biases. Thus, we find that galaxies in pairs artificially tend to be older and more bulge dominated, and to have less cold gas and different metallicities than their isolated counterparts. Also because of a biased selection, galaxies in pairs tend to live in higher density environments and in haloes of larger masses. We find that imposing constraints on redshift, stellar masses and local densities diminishes the selection biases by approximate to 70 per cent. Based on these findings, we suggest observers how to build a unique and unbiased CS in order to reveal the effect of galaxy interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available