4.7 Review

Optical and near-infrared colours as a discriminant of the age and metallicity of stellar populations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 397, Issue 2, Pages 695-708

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15022.x

Keywords

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular; cD; galaxies: stellar content

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001149/1]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. Participating Institutions
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  8. Max-Planck Society and the Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Data base (NED)
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001149/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. STFC [PP/E001149/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a comprehensive analysis of the ability of current stellar population models to reproduce the optical (ugriz) and near-infrared (JHK) colours of a small sample of well-studied nearby elliptical and S0 galaxies. We find broad agreement between the ages and metallicities derived using different population models, although different models show different systematic deviations from the measured broad-band fluxes. Although it is possible to constrain simple stellar population models to a well-defined area in age-metallicity space, there is a clear degeneracy between these parameters even with such a full range of precise colours. The precision to which age and metallicity can be determined independently, using only broad-band photometry with realistic errors, is delta[Fe/H] similar or equal to 0.18 and delta log Age similar or equal to 0.25. To constrain the populations and therefore the star formation history further, it will be necessary to combine broad-band optical-IR photometry with either spectral line indices, or else photometry at wavelengths outside this range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available