4.7 Article

The Imperial IRAS-FSC Redshift Catalogue

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 398, Issue 1, Pages 109-118

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15138.x

Keywords

catalogues; surveys; galaxies: distances and redshifts; quasars: general; large-scale structure of Universe; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. Dorothy Hodgkin Postgraduate Award (DHPA)
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Energy
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new catalogue, the Imperial IRAS-FSC Redshift Catalogue (IIFSCz), of 60 303 galaxies selected at 60 mu m from the IRAS Faint Source Catalogue (FSC). The IIFSCz consists of accurate position, optical, near-infrared and/or radio identifications, spectroscopic redshift (if available) or photometric redshift (if possible), predicted far-infrared (FIR) and submillimetre (submm) fluxes ranging from 12 to 1380 mu m based upon the best-fitting infrared template. About 55 per cent of the galaxies in the IIFSCz have spectroscopic redshifts, and a further 20 per cent have photometric redshifts obtained through either the training set or the template-fitting method. For S(60) > 0.36 Jy, the 90 per cent completeness limit of the FSC, 90 per cent of the sources have either spectroscopic or photometric redshifts. Scientific applications of the IIFSCz include validation of current and forthcoming infrared and submm/mm surveys such as AKARI, Planck and Herschel, follow-up studies of rare source populations, large-scale structure and galaxy bias, local multiwavelength luminosity functions and source counts. The catalogue is publicly available at http://astro.imperial.ac.uk/similar to mrr/fss/.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available