4.7 Article

The low-mass initial mass function in the young cluster NGC6611

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 392, Issue 3, Pages 1034-1050

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14140.x

Keywords

stars: late-type; stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs; stars: luminosity function, mass function; stars: pre-main-sequence; open cluster and associations: individual: NGC6611

Funding

  1. Space Telescope Science Institute
  2. UKIRT
  3. INTstaff
  4. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000955/1, ST/G002355/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [PP/F000057/1, PP/D000955/1, ST/G002355/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NGC6611 is the massive young cluster (2-3 Myr) that ionizes the Eagle Nebula. We present very deep photometric observations of the central region of NGC6611 obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope and the following filters: ACS/WFC F775W and F850LP and NIC2 F110W and F160W, loosely equivalent to ground-based IZJH filters. This survey reaches down to I similar to 26 mag. We construct the initial mass function (IMF) from similar to 1.5M(circle dot) well into the brown dwarf regime (down to similar to 0.02M(circle dot)). We have detected 30-35 brown dwarf candidates in this sample. The low-mass IMF is combined with a higher-mass IMF constructed from the ground-based catalogue from Oliveira et al. We compare the final IMF with those of well-studied star-forming regions: we find that the IMF of NGC6611 more closely resembles that of the low-mass star-forming region in Taurus than that of the more massive Orion Nebula Cluster. We conclude that there seems to be no severe environmental effect in the IMF due to the proximity of the massive stars in NGC6611.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available