4.7 Article

An HST/ACS investigation of the spatial and chemical structure and sub-structure of NGC 891, a Milky Way analogue

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 395, Issue 1, Pages 126-143

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14536.x

Keywords

Galaxy: formation; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: individual: NGC 891; galaxies: spiral; galaxies: structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a structural analysis of NGC 891, an edge-on galaxy that has long been considered to be an analogue of the Milky Way. Using star-counts derived from deep Hubble Space Telescope/Advanced Camera for Surveys (HST/ACS) images, we detect the presence of a thick disc component in this galaxy with vertical scaleheight h(Z) = 1.44 +/- 0.03 kpc and radial scalelength h(R) = 4.8 +/- 0.1 kpc, only slightly longer than that of the thin disc. A stellar spheroid with a de Vaucouleurs-like profile is detected from a radial distance of r similar to 0.5 kpc to the edge of the survey at r similar to 25 kpc; the structure appears to become more flattened with distance, reaching q = 0.50 in the outermost halo region probed. The halo inside of r similar to 15 kpc is moderately metal-rich (median [Fe/H] similar to -1.1) and approximately uniform in median metallicity. Beyond that distance, a modest chemical gradient is detected, with the median reaching [Fe/H] similar to -1.3 at r similar to 20 kpc. We find evidence for subtle, but very significant, small-scale variations in the median colour and density over the halo survey area. We argue that the colour variations are unlikely to be due to internal extinction or foreground extinction, and reflect instead variations in the stellar metallicity. Their presence suggests a startling conclusion: that the halo of this galaxy is composed of a large number of incompletely mixed sub-populations, testifying to its origin in a deluge of small accretions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available