4.7 Article

The evolution of the red sequence slope in massive galaxy clusters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 394, Issue 4, Pages 2098-2108

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14477.x

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001203/1, ST/F002963/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [ST/F002963/1, PP/E001203/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the evolution of the optical and near-infrared colour-magnitude relation in an homogeneous sample of massive clusters from z = 1 to the present epoch. By comparing deep Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys imaging of X-ray selected MAssive Cluster Survey (MACS) Clusters at z similar to 0.5 to the similarly selected Las Campanas/AAT Rich Cluster Survey (LARCS) sample at 7 similar to 0.1, we find that the rest-frame delta(U - V)/delta V slope of the colour-magnitude relation evolves with redshift which we attribute to the build up of the red sequence over time. This rest-frame slope evolution is not adequately reproduced by that predicted from semi-analytic models based on the Millennium Simulation despite a prescription for the build up of the red sequence by in-falling galaxies, 'strangulation'. We observe no strong correlation between this slope and the cluster environment at a given redshift demonstrating that the observed evolution is not due to a secondary correlation. Also presented are near-infrared United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) Wide Field CAMera (WFCAM) observations of the LARCS clusters which confirm and improve on the result from Stott et al. (22007) finding that there has been a two-fold increase in faint M-V > -20 galaxies on the red sequence since z = 0.5 to a significance of 5 sigma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available