4.7 Article

The clustering and host haloes of galaxy mergers at high redshift

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 394, Issue 4, Pages 2182-2190

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14488.x

Keywords

methods: N-body simulations; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: interactions; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. NSF [NSF-AST-0810820]
  2. DOE
  3. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-resolution Simulations of cosmological structure formation indicate that dark matter substructure in dense environments, such as groups and clusters, may survive for a long time. These dark matter subhaloes are they likely hosts of galaxies. We examine the small-scale spatial clustering of subhalo major mergers at high redshift using high-resolution N-body simulations of cosmological volumes. Recently merged, massive subhaloes exhibit enhanced clustering oil scales similar to 100-300h(-1) kpc, relative to all subhaloes of the same infall mass, for a short time after a major merger (<500Myr). The small-scale Clustering enhancement is smaller for lower mass subhaloes, which also show a deficit on scales just beyond the excess. Haloes hosting recent subhalo mergers tend to have more subhaloes; for massive subhaloes, the excess is stronger and it tends to increase for the most massive host haloes. The subhalo mer-er fraction is independent of halo mass for the scales we probe. In terms of satellite and central subhaloes, the merger increase in small-scale Clustering for massive subhaloes arises from recently merged massive central subhaloes having an enhanced satellite Population. Our mergers are defined via their parent infall mass ratios. Subhaloes experiencing major mass gains also exhibit a small-scale clustering enhancement, but these correspond to two-body interactions leading to two final subhaloes, rather than subhalo coalescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available