4.7 Article

The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: the Mbh-Lspheroid derived supermassive black hole mass function

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 400, Issue 3, Pages 1451-1460

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15544.x

Keywords

surveys; galaxies: bulges; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: luminosity function; mass function; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (UK)
  2. Australian Research Council (AUS)
  3. STFC [ST/G001987/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G001987/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass estimates are derived for 1743 galaxies from the Millennium Galaxy Catalogue (MGC) using the recently revised empirical relation between SMBH mass and the luminosity of the host spheroid. The MGC spheroid luminosities are based on R1/n bulge plus exponential-disc decompositions. The majority of black hole masses reside between 106 M-circle dot and an upper limit of 2 x 109 M-circle dot. Using previously determined space-density weights, we derive the SMBH mass function which we fit with a Schechter-like function. Integrating the black hole mass function over 106 < M-bh/M-circle dot < 1010 gives an SMBH mass density of (3.8 +/- 0.6) x 105 h3(70) M-circle dot Mpc-3 for early-type galaxies and (0.96 +/- 0.2) x 105 h3(70) M-circle dot Mpc-3 for late-type galaxies. The errors are estimated from Monte Carlo simulations which include the uncertainties in the M-bh-L relation, the luminosity of the host spheroid and the intrinsic scatter of the M-bh-L relation. Assuming SMBHs form via baryonic accretion, we find that (0.008 +/- 0.002) h3(70) per cent of the Universe's baryons are currently locked up in SMBHs. This result is consistent with our previous estimate based on the M-bh-n (Sersic index) relation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available