4.7 Article

Follow-up observations at 16 and 33 GHz of extragalactic sources from WMAP 3-yr data: I - Spectral properties☆

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 400, Issue 2, Pages 984-994

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15518.x

Keywords

galaxies: active; cosmic macrowave background; cosmology: observations; radio continuum: general

Funding

  1. Cambridge University
  2. PPARC/STFC
  3. PPARC
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [AYA2001-1657]
  5. STFC [ST/G002916/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002916/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present follow-up observations of 97 point sources from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) 3-yr data, contained within the New Extragalactic WMAP Point Source catalogue between -4 degrees < delta < 60 degrees; the sources form a flux-density-limited sample complete to 1.1 Jy (approximate to 5 Sigma) at 33 GHz. Our observations were made at 16 GHz using the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager and at 33 GHz with the Very Small Array (VSA). 94 of the sources have reliable, simultaneous - typically a few minutes apart - observations with both telescopes. The spectra between 13.9 and 33.75 GHz are very different from those of bright sources at low frequency: 44 per cent have rising spectra (alpha 33.75(13.9) < 0.0), where S proportional to nu-alpha, and 93 per cent have spectra with alpha 33.75(13.9) < 0.5; the median spectral index is 0.04. For the brighter sources, the agreement between VSA and WMAP 33-GHz flux densities averaged over sources is very good. However, for the fainter sources, the VSA tends to measure lower values for the flux densities than WMAP. We suggest that the main cause of this effect is the Eddington bias arising from variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available