4.7 Article

Dynamical friction and galaxy merging time-scales

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 383, Issue 1, Pages 93-101

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12530.x

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time-scale for galaxies within merging dark matter haloes to merge with each other is an important ingredient in galaxy formation models. Accurate estimates of merging time-scales are required for predictions of astrophysical quantities such as black hole binary merger rates, the build-up of stellar mass in central galaxies and the statistical properties of satellite galaxies within dark matter haloes. In this paper, we study the merging time-scales of extended dark matter haloes using N-body simulations. We compare these results to standard estimates based on the Chandrasekhar theory of dynamical friction. We find that these standard predictions for merging time-scales, which are often used in semi-analytic galaxy formation models, are systematically shorter than those found in simulations. The discrepancy is approximately a factor of 1.7 for M-sat/M-host approximate to 0.1 and becomes larger for more disparate satellite-to-host mass ratios, reaching a factor of similar to 3.3 for M-sat/M-host approximate to 0.01. Based on our simulations, we propose a new, easily implementable fitting formula that accurately predicts the time-scale for an extended satellite to sink from the virial radius of a host halo down to the halo's centre for a wide range of M-sat/M-host and orbits. Including a central bulge in each galaxy changes the merging time-scale by less than or similar to 10 per cent. To highlight one concrete application of our results, we show that merging time-scales often used in the literature overestimate the growth of stellar mass by satellite accretion by approximate to 40 per cent, with the extra mass gained in low mass ratio mergers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available