4.7 Article

Measuring the inclination and mass-to-light ratio of axisymmetric galaxies via anisotropic Jeans models of stellar kinematics

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13754.x

Keywords

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D005574/1]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D005574/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [PP/D005574/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a simple and efficient anisotropic generalization of the semi-isotropic (two-integral) axisymmetric Jeans formalism, which is used to model the stellar kinematics of galaxies. The following is assumed: (i) a constant mass-to-light ratio (M/L) and (ii) a velocity ellipsoid that is aligned with cylindrical coordinates (R, z) and characterized by the classic anisotropy parameter beta(z) = 1-<(v(z)(2))over bar>/<(v(R)(2))over bar>. Our simple models are fit to SAURON integral-field observations of the stellar kinematics for a set of fast-rotator early-type galaxies. With only two free parameters (beta(z) and the inclination), the models generally provide remarkably good descriptions of the shape of the first (V) and second (Vrms root V-2 + sigma(2)) velocity moments, once a detailed description of the surface brightness is given. This is consistent with previous findings on the dynamical structure of these objects. With the observationally motivated assumption that beta(z) greater than or similar to 0, the method is able to recover the inclination. The technique can be used to determine the dynamical M/L and angular momenta of early-type fast-rotators and spiral galaxies, especially when the quality of the data does not justify more sophisticated modelling approaches. This formalism allows for the inclusion of dark matter, supermassive black holes, spatially varying anisotropy and multiple kinematic components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available