4.7 Article

Lyα damping wing constraints on inhomogeneous reionization

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 385, Issue 3, Pages 1348-1358

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12836.x

Keywords

intergalactic medium; cosmology : theory; early Universe

Funding

  1. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0829737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One well-known way to constrain the hydrogen neutral fraction, (x) over bar (HI), of the high-redshift intergalactic medium (IGM) is through the shape of the red damping wing of the Ly alpha absorption line. We examine this method's effectiveness in light of recent models showing that the IGM neutral fraction is highly inhomogeneous on large scales during reionization. Using both analytic models and 'seminumeric' simulations, we show that the 'picket-fence' absorption typical in reionization models introduces both scatter and a systematic bias to the measurement of (x) over bar (HI). In particular, we show that simple fits to the damping wing tend to overestimate the true neutral fraction in a partially ionized universe, with a fractional error of similar to 30 per cent near the middle of reionization. This bias is generic to any inhomogeneous model. However, the bias is reduced and can even underestimate (x) over bar (HI) if the observational sample only probes a subset of the entire halo population, such as quasars with large H II regions. We also find that the damping wing absorption profile is generally steeper than one would naively expect in a homogeneously ionized universe. The profile steepens and the sightline-to-sightline scatter increases as reionization progresses. Of course, the bias and scatter also depend on (x) over bar (HI) and so can, at least in principle, be used to constrain it. Damping wing constraints must therefore be interpreted by comparison to theoretical models of inhomogeneous reionization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available