4.7 Article

Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 389, Issue 3, Pages 1179-1189

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x

Keywords

methods : data analysis; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : general; galaxies : spiral

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. US Department of Energy
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002335/1, ST/F00298X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/F00298X/1, ST/F002335/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to understand the formation and subsequent evolution of galaxies one must first distinguish between the two main morphological classes of massive systems: spirals and early-type systems. This paper introduces a project, Galaxy Zoo, which provides visual morphological classifications for nearly one million galaxies, extracted from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). This achievement was made possible by inviting the general public to visually inspect and classify these galaxies via the internet. The project has obtained more than 4 x 10(7) individual classifications made by similar to 10(5) participants. We discuss the motivation and strategy for this project, and detail how the classifications were performed and processed. We find that Galaxy Zoo results are consistent with those for subsets of SDSS galaxies classified by professional astronomers, thus demonstrating that our data provide a robust morphological catalogue. Obtaining morphologies by direct visual inspection avoids introducing biases associated with proxies for morphology such as colour, concentration or structural parameters. In addition, this catalogue can be used to directly compare SDSS morphologies with older data sets. The colour-magnitude diagrams for each morphological class are shown, and we illustrate how these distributions differ from those inferred using colour alone as a proxy for morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available