4.7 Article

The colours of satellite galaxies in groups and clusters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 389, Issue 4, Pages 1619-1629

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13698.x

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : luminosity function, mass function

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. STFC
  4. STFC [ST/F002963/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/F002300/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002300/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/F002963/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current models of galaxy formation predict satellite galaxies in groups and clusters that are redder than observed. We investigate the effect on the colours of satellite galaxies produced by the ram-pressure stripping of their hot-gaseous atmospheres as the satellites orbit within their parent halo. We incorporate a model of the stripping process based on detailed hydrodynamic simulations within the Durham semi-analytic model of galaxy formation. The simulations show that the environment in groups and clusters is less aggressive than previously assumed. The main uncertainty in the model is the treatment of gas expelled by supernovae. With reasonable assumptions for the stripping of this material, we find that satellite galaxies are able to retain a significant fraction of their hot gas for several Gyr, thereby replenishing their reservoirs of cold, star-forming gas and remaining blue for a relatively long period of time. A bimodal distribution of galaxy colours, similar to that observed in Sloan Digital Sky Survey data, is established and the colours of the satellite galaxies are in good agreement with the data. In addition, our model naturally accounts for the observed dependence of satellite colours on environment, from small groups to high-mass clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available