4.7 Article

MOST satellite photometry of stars in the M67 field: eclipsing binaries, blue stragglers and δ Scuti variables

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 391, Issue 1, Pages 343-353

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13889.x

Keywords

binaries: close; binaries: eclipsing; stars: variables: other

Funding

  1. Canadian Space Agency Space Enhancement Programme
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. FQRNT (Quebec)
  4. Canadian Space Agency
  5. Austrian Space Agency
  6. Austrian Science Fund [P17580]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P17580] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present two series of MOST (Microvariability and Oscillations of STars) space-based photometry, covering nearly continuously 10 d in 2004 and 30 d in 2007, of selected variable stars in the upper main sequence of the old open cluster M67. New high-precision light curves were obtained for the blue straggler binary/triple systems AH Cnc, ES Cnc and EV Cnc. The precision and phase coverage of ES Cnc and EV Cnc is by far superior to any previous observations. The light curve of ES Cnc is modelled in detail, assuming two dark photospheric spots and Roche geometry. An analysis of the light curve of AH Cnc indicates a low mass ratio (q similar to 0.13) and a high inclination angle for this system. Two new long-period eclipsing binaries, GSC 814-323 and HD 75638 (non-members of M67) were discovered. We also present ground-based DDO spectroscopy of ES Cnc and of the newly found eclipsing binaries. Especially interesting is HD 75638, a member of a visual binary, which must itself be a triple or a higher multiplicity system. New light curves of two delta Scuti pulsators, EX Cnc and EW Cnc, have been analysed leading to detection of 26 and eight pulsation frequencies of high temporal stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available