4.7 Article

The metallicity extremes of the Sagittarius dSph:: SALT spectroscopy of PNe

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 388, Issue 4, Pages 1667-1678

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13435.x

Keywords

stars : abundances; stars : mass-loss; planetary nebulae : general; galaxies : individual : Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F003196/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F003196/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work we present the first spectroscopic results obtained with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) during its performance-verification phase. We find that the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy (Sgr) contains a youngest stellar population with [O/H] approximate to -0.2 and age t > 1 Gyr, and an oldest population with [O/H] = -2.0. The values are based on spectra of two planetary nebulae (PNe), using empirical abundance determinations. We calculated abundances for O, N, Ne, Ar, S, Cl, Fe, C and He. We confirm the high abundances of PN StWr 2-21 with 12 + log(O/H) = 8.57 +/- 0.02 dex. The other PN studied, BoBn 1, is an extraordinary object in that the neon abundance exceeds that of oxygen. The abundances of S, Ar and Cl in BoBn 1 yield the original stellar metallicity, corresponding to 12 + log(O/H) = 6.72 +/- 0.16 dex which is 1/110 of the solar value. The actual [O/H] is much higher: third dredge-up enriched the material by a factor of similar to 12 in oxygen, similar to 240 in nitrogen and similar to 70 in neon. Neon as well as nitrogen and oxygen content may have been produced in the intershell of low-mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. Well defined broad WR lines are present in the spectrum of StWr 2-21 and absent in the spectrum of BoBn 1. This puts the fraction of [WR]-type central PNe stars to 67 per cent for dSph galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available