4.5 Review

Neural Transcription Factors: from Embryos to Neural Stem Cells

Journal

MOLECULES AND CELLS
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 705-712

Publisher

KOREAN SOC MOLECULAR & CELLULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2014.0227

Keywords

Foxd4; neural cell fate; neural induction; neural plate stem cells; neural progenitor cells

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2012R1A1A2042334]
  2. Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ009564]
  3. NIH [NS23158]
  4. NSF [MCB1121711]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1121711] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE022065] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS023158] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The early steps of neural development in the vertebrate embryo are regulated by sets of transcription factors that control the induction of proliferative, pluripotent neural precursors, the expansion of neural plate stem cells, and their transition to differentiating neural progenitors. These early events are critical for producing a pool of multipotent cells capable of giving rise to the multitude of neurons and glia that form the central nervous system. In this review we summarize findings from gain- and loss-of-function studies in embryos that detail the gene regulatory network responsible for these early events. We discuss whether this information is likely to be similar in mammalian embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells that are cultured according to protocols designed to produce neurons. The similarities and differences between the embryo and stem cells may provide important guidance to stem cell protocols designed to create immature neural cells for therapeutic uses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available