4.6 Article

Differential Pharmacological Activities of Oxygen Numbers on the Sulfoxide Moiety ofWasabi Compound 6-(Methylsulfinyl) Hexyl Isothiocyanate in Human Oral Cancer Cells

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102427

Keywords

wasabi; 6-MITC; I7447; I7557; oral cancer; mitosis; apoptosis

Funding

  1. MacKay Memorial Hospital [MMH-E-107-13]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 106-2314-B-195-002-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

6-(methylsulfinyl) hexyl isothiocyanate (6-MITC) is a naturally occurring compound isolated fromWasabia japonica (wasabi). The synthetic derivatives, 6-(methylsulfenyl) hexyl isothiocyanate (I7447) and 6-(methylsulfonyl) hexyl isothiocyanate (I7557), were derived from 6-MITC with the deletion and addition of oxygen, respectively. We aimed to evaluate the effect of these synthetic compounds on human oral cancer cells, SAS andOECM-1. All three compounds (I7447, 6-MITC, and I7557) inhibited the viability of SAS and OECM-1 cells usingMTT assay. Morphological observations showed various proportions of mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cells treated with these compounds. Cell cycle analysis revealed relatively abundant G2/Marrest in 6-MITC and I7557-treated cells, whereas sub-G1 accumulation was found in I7447-treated cells. In using phosphorylated histone H3 as a marker for mitosis, the addition of 6-MITC and I7557 (excluding I7447) could be shown to arrest cells during mitosis. In contrast, I7447 induced more prominent apoptosis than the 6-MITC or I7557 compounds. The down-regulated expression of the phosphorylated form of CHK1 and Cdc25c was noted in 6-MITC and I7557-treated cells. I7557 could sensitize SAS cells to death by radiation. Thewasabi compound, 6-MITC, and its chemical derivativeswith different numbers of oxygen may have differential pharmacological effects on human oral cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available