4.6 Article

The Polysaccharides from Codonopsis pilosula Modulates the Immunity and Intestinal Microbiota of Cyclophosphamide-Treated Immunosuppressed Mice

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071801

Keywords

Codonopsis pilosula; polysaccharides; intestinal microbiota; mucosal immunity; Immunosuppression

Funding

  1. International Cooperation Projects of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017HH0093]
  2. General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602704]
  3. Shenzhen Overseas High-Level Personnel Innovation Special Fund [KQCX2015033ll7354154]
  4. Sichuan Veterinary Medicine and Drug Innovation Group of China Agricultural Research System (CARS-SVDIP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on previous studies about microflora regulation and immunity enhancement activities of polysaccharides from Codonopsis pilosula Nannf. var. modesta (Nannf.) L. T. Shen (CPP), there is little study on intestinal mucosal immunity, which is a possible medium for contacting microflora and immunity. In the present study, the BALB/c mice were divided into five groups (eight mice in each group), including a normal group (Con), a model control group (Model), and model groups that were administered CPP (50, 100, 200 mg/kg/d) orally each day for seven days after intraperitoneal injection of 60 mg/kg BW/d cyclophosphamide (CP) for three days. CPP recovered the spleen index and restored the levels of IFN-, IL-2, IL-10, as well as serum IgG. In addition, it elevated ileum secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), the number of Lactobacillus and acetic acid content in cecum. These results indicated that CPP plays an important role in the protection against immunosuppression, especially mucosa immune damage, and the inhibition of pathogenic bacteria colonization, which could be considered a potential natural source of immunoregulator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available