4.6 Article

Inhibition of PCAF Histone Acetyltransferase, Cytotoxicity and Cell Permeability of 2-Acylamino-1-(3-or 4-Carboxy-phenyl)benzamides

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 13116-13131

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/molecules171113116

Keywords

histone acetyltransferase (HAT); p300/CBP associated factor (PCAF); cytotoxicity; 2-acylaminobenzamide; Caco-2 cell permeability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small molecule HAT inhibitors are useful tools to unravel the role of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) in the cell and they also have relevance in oncology. We synthesized a series of 2-acylamino-1-(3- or 4-carboxyphenyl) benzamides 8-19 bearing C6, C8, C10, C12, C14, and C16 acyl chains at the 2-amino position of 2-aminobenzoic acid. Enzyme inhibition of these compounds was investigated using in vitro PCAF HAT assays. The inhibitory activities of compounds 8-10, 16, and 19 were similar to that of anacardic acid, and 17 was found to be more active than anacardic acid at 100 mu M. Compounds 11-15 showed the low inhibitory activity on PCAF HAT. The cytotoxicity of the synthesized compounds was evaluated by SRB (sulforhodamine B) assay against seven human cancer cell lines: HT-29 (colon), HCT-116 (colon), MDA-231 (breast), A549 (lung), Hep3B (hepatoma), HeLa (cervical) and Caki (kidney) and one normal cell line (HSF). Compound 17 was more active than anacardic acid against human colon cancer (HCT 116, IC50: 29.17 mu M), human lung cancer (A549, IC50: 32.09 mu M) cell lines. 18 was more active than anacardic acid against human colon cancer (HT-29, IC50: 35.49 mu M and HCT 116, IC50: 27.56 mu M), human lung cancer (A549, IC50: 30.69 mu M), and human cervical cancer (HeLa, IC50: 34.41 mu M) cell lines. The apparent permeability coefficient (P-app, cm/s) values of two compounds (16 and 17) were evaluated as 68.21 and 71.48 x 10(-6) cm/s by Caco-2 cell permeability assay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available