4.7 Article

Autologous Myoblast Transplantation for Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: a Phase I/IIa Clinical Study

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 219-225

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.155

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Health Ministry PHRC National research program
  2. Assistance publique-Hopitaux de Paris (APHP)
  3. University Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie
  4. INSERM
  5. CNRS
  6. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  7. EU [037479]
  8. MYOAGE [Health-F2-2009-223576]
  9. Parent project (PPMD-Nl)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is a late-onset autosomal dominant genetic disease mainly characterized by ptosis and dysphagia. We conducted a phase I/IIa clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00773227) using autologous myoblast transplantation following myotomy in adult OPMD patients. This study included 12 patients with clinical diagnosis of OPMD, indication for cricopharyngeal myotomy, and confirmed genetic diagnosis. The feasibility and safety end points of both autologous myoblast transplantation and the surgical procedure were assessed by videoendoscopy in addition to physical examinations. Potential therapeutic benefit was also assessed through videoendoscopy and video-fluoroscopy of swallowing, quality of life score, dysphagia grade, and a drink test. Patients were injected with a median of 178 million myoblasts following myotomy. Short and long-term (2 years) safety and tolerability were observed in all the patients, with no adverse effects. There was an improvement in the quality of life score for all 12 patients, and no functional degradation in swallowing was observed for 10 patients. A cell dose-dependant improvement in swallowing was even observed in this study. This trial supports the hypothesis that a local injection of autologous myoblasts in the pharyngeal muscles is a safe and efficient procedure for OPMD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available