4.7 Article

Therapeutic Delivery of miR-200c Enhances Radiosensitivity in Lung Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1494-1503

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2014.79

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  2. National Cancer Institute [K12 11111246, 9276, P01CA06294, R01s CA155196, CA160398, P50 CA070907, P30 CA016672]
  3. Department of Defense (BATTLE) [W81XWH-06-1-0303]
  4. Department of Defense (PROSPECT) [W81XWH-07-1-03060]
  5. Wiegand Foundation
  6. FAPESP [2013/20842-6]
  7. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microRNA (miR)-200s and their negative regulator ZEB1 have been extensively studied in the context of the epithelial mesenchymal transition. Loss of miR-200s has been shown to enhance cancer aggressiveness and metastasis, whereas replacement of miR-200 miRNAs has been shown to inhibit cell growth in several types of tumors, including lung cancer. Here, we reveal a novel function of miR-200c, a member of the miR-200 family, in regulating intracellular reactive oxygen species signaling and explore a potential application for its use in combination with therapies known to increase oxidative, stress such as radiation. We found that miR-200c overexpression increased cellular radiosensitivity by direct regulation of the oxidative stress response genes PRDX2, GAPB/Nrf2, and SESN1 in ways that inhibits DNA double-strand breaks repair, increase levels of reactive oxygen species, and upregulate p21. We used a lung cancer xenograft model to further demonstrate the therapeutic potential of systemic delivery of miR-200c to enhance radiosensitivity in lung cancer. Our findings suggest that the antitumor effects of miR-200c result partially from its regulation of the oxidative stress response; they further suggest that miR-200c, in combination with radiation, could represent a therapeutic strategy in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available