4.7 Article

Kinetics of Tumor Destruction by Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T Cells

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 623-633

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.262

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailan
  2. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-11-1-0625]
  3. NIH [CA094237, P50 CA058183]
  4. Adrienne Helis Malvin Medical Research Foundation
  5. Dan L Duncan Cancer Center [P30CA125123]
  6. Dan L. Duncan Chair
  7. Fayez Sarofim Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells as a therapy for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors is becoming more widespread. However, the infusion of a T-cell product targeting a single tumor-associated antigen may lead to target antigen modulation under this selective pressure, with subsequent tumor immune escape. With the purpose of preventing this phenomenon, we have studied the impact of simultaneously targeting two distinct antigens present on tumor cells: namely mucin 1 and prostate stem cell antigen, both of which are expressed in a variety of solid tumors, including pancreatic and prostate cancer. When used individually, CAR T cells directed against either tumor antigen were able to kill target-expressing cancer cells, but tumor heterogeneity led to immune escape. As a combination therapy, we demonstrate superior antitumor effects using both CARs simultaneously, but this was nevertheless insufficient to achieve a complete response. To understand the mechanism of escape, we studied the kinetics of T-cell killing and found that the magnitude of tumor destruction depended not only on the presence of target antigens but also on the intensity of expression-a feature that could be altered by administering epigenetic modulators that upregulated target expression and enhanced CAR T-cell potency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available