4.7 Article

Oral Vaccination With Adeno-associated Virus Vectors Expressing the Neu Oncogene Inhibits the Growth of Murine Breast Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 680-687

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2012.260

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  2. Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Cincinnati

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAV) have been used for therapeutic gene transfer. These vectors offer a number of advantages including resistance to the effects of pH, a broad cellular tropism, efficient gene transfer, persistence of gene expression, and little toxicity. AAV vectors; however, at high doses can induce humoral and cellular immune responses. While potentially problematic for replacement gene therapy, this effect may be advantageous for antitumor vaccination. We examined the activity of an oral and intramuscular antitumor vaccination using AAV serotypes 5 and 6 expressing a truncated neu oncogene in a neu-positive murine TUBO breast cancer. model. Mice receiving a single oral administration of AAV5-neu or AAV6-neu demonstrated improved survival. Oral vaccination significantly improved survivals compared with intramuscular vaccination. Mice vaccinated with AAV6-neu survived longer than those treated with AAV5-neu. Vaccination with AAV5-neu or AAV6-neu induced both humoral and cellular immune responses against the NEU antigen. These responses were more robust in the mice undergoing oral vaccination compared with mice receiving the intramuscular vaccination. Protection from tumor was long lasting with 80% of the animals treated with oral AAV6-neu surviving a re-challenge with TUBO cells at 120 and 320 days post-vaccination. Further evaluation of AAV-based vectors as tumor vaccines is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available