4.7 Article

ChAd63-MVA-vectored Blood-stage Malaria Vaccines Targeting MSP1 and AMA1: Assessment of Efficacy Against Mosquito Bite Challenge in Humans

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 2355-2368

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2012.223

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Malaria Vaccine Development Association
  2. European Commission [LSHP-CT-2007-037506, 242095]
  3. UK Medical Research Council [G0700735, G1000527]
  4. UK National Institute of Health Research through the Oxford Biomedical Research Centre [A91301]
  5. Southampton NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility
  6. Wellcome Trust [084113/Z/07/Z, 45488/Z/05, 094449/Z/10/Z]
  7. EVIMalaR
  8. PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative
  9. Intramural Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  10. Wellcome Trust [084113/Z/07/Z, 094449/Z/10/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  11. MRC [G1000527, G0700735] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [G0700735, G1000527] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0509-10233] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The induction of cellular immunity, in conjunction with antibodies, may be essential for vaccines to protect against blood-stage infection with the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. We have shown that prime-boost delivery of P. falciparum blood-stage antigens by chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) followed by the attenuated orthopoxvirus MVA is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults. Here, we report on vaccine efficacy against controlled human malaria infection delivered by mosquito bites. The blood-stage malaria vaccines were administered alone, or together (MSP1+AMA1), or with a pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine candidate (MSP1+ME-TRAP). In this first human use of coadministered ChAd63-MVA regimes, we demonstrate immune interference whereby responses against merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1) are dominant over apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and ME-TRAP. We also show that induction of strong cellular immunity against MSP1 and AMA1 is safe, but does not impact on parasite growth rates in the blood. In a subset of vaccinated volunteers, a delay in time to diagnosis was observed and sterilizing protection was observed in one volunteer coimmunized with MSP1+AMA1-results consistent with vaccine-induced pre-erythrocytic, rather than blood-stage, immunity. These data call into question the utility of T cell-inducing blood-stage malaria vaccines and suggest that the focus should remain on high-titer antibody induction against susceptible antigen targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available