4.7 Article

Phage Display-directed Discovery of LEDGF/p75 Binding Cyclic Peptide Inhibitors of HIV Replication

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 2064-2075

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2012.132

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission through the European Consortia TRIoH [LSHB-CT-2003-503480]
  2. European Commission through the European Consortia THINC [HEALTH-F3-2008-201032]
  3. Flemish FWO
  4. KU Leuven BOF
  5. NIH [P01 AI048240]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase (IN) and its cellular cofactor lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF/p75) is crucial for HIV replication. While recently discovered LEDGINs inhibit HIV-1 replication by occupying the LEDGF/p75 pocket in IN, it remained to be demonstrated whether LEDGF/p75 by itself can be targeted. By phage display we identified cyclic peptides (CPs) as the first LEDGF/p75 ligands that inhibit the LEDGF/p75 IN interaction. The CPs inhibit HIV replication in different cell lines without overt toxicity. In accord with the role of LEDGF/p75 in HIV integration and its inhibition by LEDGINs, CP64, and CP65 block HIV replication primarily by inhibiting the integration step. The CPs retained activity against HIV strains resistant to raltegravir or LEDGINs. Saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR showed residues in CP64 that strongly interact with LEDGF/p75 but not with HIV IN. Mutational analysis identified tryptophan as an important residue responsible for the activity of the peptides. Serial passaging of virus in the presence of CPs did not yield resistant strains. Our work provides proof-of-concept for direct targeting of LEDGF/p75 as novel therapeutic strategy and the CPs thereby serve as scaffold for future development of new HIV therapeutics. Received 2 March 2012; accepted 23 April 2012; advance online publication 24 July 2012. doi:10.1038/mt.2012.132

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available