4.7 Article

Self-inactivating gammaretroviral vectors for gene therapy of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 590-598

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300393

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0501969] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  3. Department of Health Funding Source: Medline
  4. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V0907, V1223] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G0501969] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G0501969] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1) has proven highly effective for long- term restoration of immunity in human subjects. However, the development of lymphoproliferative complications due to dysregulated proto-oncogene expression has underlined the necessity for developing safer vector systems. To reduce the potential for insertional mutagenesis, we have evaluated the efficacy of self-inactivating (SIN) gammaretroviral vectors in cellular and in vivo models of SCID-X1. Vectors incorporating an internal human elongation factor-1a regulatory element were capable of fully restoring the lymphoid differentiation potential of gamma c-deficient lineage negative cells. Multilineage lymphoid reconstitution of a murine model was achieved at a similar level to that achieved by a conventional longterminal repeat (LTR)-regulated vector used in previous clinical trials. Functional proliferative responses to mitogenic stimuli were also restored, and serum immunoglobulin levels were normalized. The reduced mutagenic potential conferred by SIN vector configurations and alternative non-LTR-based regulatory elements, together with proven efficacy in correction of cellular defects provides an important platform for development of the next phase of clinical trials for SCID-X1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available