4.7 Article

Mash1 and Neurogenin 2 Enhance Survival and Differentiation of Neural Precursor Cells After Transplantation to Rat Brains via Distinct Modes of Action

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1873-1882

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.189

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea [SC4150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neural precursor cells (NPCs) are regarded as a promising source of donor cells in transplantation-based therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. However, poor survival and limited neuronal differentiation of the transplanted NPCs remain critical limitations for developing therapeutic strategies. In this study, we investigated the effects of the proneural basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors Mash1 and Neurogenin 2 (Ngn2) in neuronal differentiation and survival of NPCs. Induction of Mash1 or Ngn2 expression strikingly enhanced neuronal differentiation of cultured NPCs in vitro. Ngn2-transduced NPCs underwent a rapid cell cycle arrest, which often accompanies differentiation. In contrast, cells continuously expanded upon Mash1 expression during NPC differentiation. Notably, sonic hedgehog (SHH) was upregulated by Mash1 and mediated the proliferative and survival effects of Mash1 on NPCs. Upon transplantation into adult rat brains, Mash1-expressing NPCs yielded large grafts enriched with neurons compared to control LacZ-transduced NPCs. Interestingly, enhancements in neuronal yield, as well as in donor cell survival, were also achieved by transplanting Ngn2-transduced NPCs. We show that a differentiation stage- and cell density-dependent survival effect of Ngn2 involves neurotrophin3 (NT3)/TrkC-mediated signaling. Together, these findings suggest potential benefits of bHLH gene manipulation to develop successful transplantation strategies for brain disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available