4.7 Article

HSP70 and constitutively active HSF1 mediate protection against CDCrel-1-mediated toxicity

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1048-1055

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.68

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS44576, R01 NS044576, R01 NS044576-06] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in cellular quality control mechanisms are thought to contribute to the neuropathology of Parkinson's disease ( PD). Overexpressing heat shock proteins ( HSPs) may constitute a powerful therapeutic strategy for PD, because they boost the ability of the cell to eliminate unwanted proteins. We investigated the neuroprotective potential of HSP70, HSP40, and H-BH, a constitutively active form of heat shock factor 1, in a rat model of PD based on adeno-associated virus ( AAV) vector-mediated overexpression of CDCrel-1, a parkin substrate known to be toxic to dopaminergic neurons. AAV vector-mediated overexpression of H-BH and of HSP70 afforded similar levels of protection against CDCrel-1 toxicity, with similar to 20% improvement in survival of dopaminergic neurons as compared to the controls. The assessment of protection conferred was made using tyrosine hydroxylase ( TH) and HuC/ D immunohistochemistry and Fluoro-Gold retrograde tracing, and by observing the extent of preservation of spontaneous function and also the extent of drug-induced motor function. In contrast to H-BH and HSP70, HSP40 overexpression exacerbated CDCrel-1-mediated cell death. Real-time reverse transcriptase ( RT)-PCR analysis showed that H-BH had the effect of upregulating endogenous HSP70 and HSP40 mRNA levels 10-fold and 4-fold over basal levels, respectively, whereas AAV vector-mediated HSP70 and HSP40 mRNA levels were over 100-fold higher. Our results suggest that a comparatively modest upregulation of multiple HSPs may be an effective approach for achieving significant neuroprotection in PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available