4.6 Article

A negative genetic interaction map in isogenic cancer cell lines reveals cancer cell vulnerabilities

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2013.54

Keywords

genetic interaction; genome stability; mitotic stress; pooled shRNA screening

Funding

  1. Ministry of Research and Innovation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. CIHR
  4. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  5. Ontario Ministry of Innovation GL2 program
  6. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  7. Canada Research Chair in Functional Genomics of Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improved efforts are necessary to define the functional product of cancer mutations currently being revealed through large-scale sequencing efforts. Using genome-scale pooled shRNA screening technology, we mapped negative genetic interactions across a set of isogenic cancer cell lines and confirmed hundreds of these interactions in orthogonal co-culture competition assays to generate a high-confidence genetic interaction network of differentially essential or differential essentiality (DiE) genes. The network uncovered examples of conserved genetic interactions, densely connected functional modules derived from comparative genomics with model systems data, functions for uncharacterized genes in the human genome and targetable vulnerabilities. Finally, we demonstrate a general applicability of DiE gene signatures in determining genetic dependencies of other non-isogenic cancer cell lines. For example, the PTEN (-/-) DiE genes reveal a signature that can preferentially classify PTEN-dependent genotypes across a series of non-isogenic cell lines derived from the breast, pancreas and ovarian cancers. Our reference network suggests that many cancer vulnerabilities remain to be discovered through systematic derivation of a network of differentially essential genes in an isogenic cancer cell model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available