4.6 Article

Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2009.52

Keywords

dynamics; hierarchy; noise; systems biology; transcription network

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, NIEHS
  2. National Institutes of Health, NLM
  3. MRC
  4. Medical Research Council [G0600158, MC_U105185859] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [MC_U105185859, G0600158] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although several studies have provided important insights into the general principles of biological networks, the link between network organization and the genome-scale dynamics of the underlying entities (genes, mRNAs, and proteins) and its role in systems behavior remain unclear. Here we show that transcription factor (TF) dynamics and regulatory network organization are tightly linked. By classifying TFs in the yeast regulatory network into three hierarchical layers (top, core, and bottom) and integrating diverse genome-scale datasets, we find that the TFs have static and dynamic properties that are similar within a layer and different across layers. At the protein level, the top-layer TFs are relatively abundant, long-lived, and noisy compared with the core- and bottom-layer TFs. Although variability in expression of top-layer TFs might confer a selective advantage, as this permits at least some members in a clonal cell population to initiate a response to changing conditions, tight regulation of the core- and bottom-layer TFs may minimize noise propagation and ensure fidelity in regulation. We propose that the interplay between network organization and TF dynamics could permit differential utilization of the same underlying network by distinct members of a clonal cell population. Molecular Systems Biology 5: 294; published online 18 August 2009; doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.52

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available