4.6 Article

Theoretical and experimental analysis links isoform-specific ERK signalling to cell fate decisions

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2009.91

Keywords

cytokine receptor; ERK; information processing; proliferation; sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. EU [LSHG-CT-2004-512060]
  2. SBCancer network in the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
  5. Israel's Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)
  6. Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell fate decisions are regulated by the coordinated activation of signalling pathways such as the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) cascade, but contributions of individual kinase isoforms are mostly unknown. By combining quantitative data from erythropoietin-induced pathway activation in primary erythroid progenitor (colony-forming unit erythroid stage, CFU-E) cells with mathematical modelling, we predicted and experimentally confirmed a distributive ERK phosphorylation mechanism in CFU-E cells. Model analysis showed bow-tie-shaped signal processing and inherently transient signalling for cytokine-induced ERK signalling. Sensitivity analysis predicted that, through a feedback-mediated process, increasing one ERK isoform reduces activation of the other isoform, which was verified by protein over-expression. We calculated ERK activation for biochemically not addressable but physiologically relevant ligand concentrations showing that double-phosphorylated ERK1 attenuates proliferation beyond a certain activation level, whereas activated ERK2 enhances proliferation with saturation kinetics. Thus, we provide a quantitative link between earlier unobservable signalling dynamics and cell fate decisions. Molecular Systems Biology 5: 334; published online 22 December 2009; doi:10.1038/msb.2009.91

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available