4.6 Review

Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2008.61

Keywords

mass spectrometry; MRM; proteomics; quantitative; SRM

Funding

  1. F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Basel, Switzerland)
  2. Competence Center for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Disease
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [31000-10767]
  4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  5. National Institutes of Health [N01-HV-28179]
  6. SystemsX. ch
  7. Swiss initiative in systems biology
  8. DIVISION OF HEART AND VASCULAR DISEASES [N01HV028179] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systems biology relies on data sets in which the same group of proteins is consistently identified and precisely quantified across multiple samples, a requirement that is only partially achieved by current proteomics approaches. Selected reaction monitoring (SRM)-also called multiple reaction monitoring-is emerging as a technology that ideally complements the discovery capabilities of shotgun strategies by its unique potential for reliable quantification of analytes of low abundance in complex mixtures. In an SRM experiment, a predefined precursor ion and one of its fragments are selected by the two mass filters of a triple quadrupole instrument and monitored over time for precise quantification. A series of transitions (precursor/fragment ion pairs) in combination with the retention time of the targeted peptide can constitute a definitive assay. Typically, a large number of peptides are quantified during a single LC-MS experiment. This tutorial explains the application of SRM for quantitative proteomics, including the selection of proteotypic peptides and the optimization and validation of transitions. Furthermore, normalization and various factors affecting sensitivity and accuracy are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available