4.8 Article

Decreased dopamine activity predicts relapse in methamphetamine abusers

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 918-925

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2011.86

Keywords

dopamine release; early withdrawal; methamphetamine; positron emission tomography; relapse

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy OBER [DE-ACO2-76CH00016]
  2. NIH [R01DA06891, MO1RR10710, Z01AA000550]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies in methamphetamine (METH) abusers showed that the decreases in brain dopamine (DA) function might recover with protracted detoxification. However, the extent to which striatal DA function in METH predicts recovery has not been evaluated. Here we assessed whether striatal DA activity in METH abusers is associated with clinical outcomes. Brain DA D2 receptor (D2R) availability was measured with positron emission tomography and [C-11]raclopride in 16 METH abusers, both after placebo and after challenge with 60mg oral methylphenidate (MPH) (to measure DA release) to assess whether it predicted clinical outcomes. For this purpose, METH abusers were tested within 6 months of last METH use and then followed up for 9 months of abstinence. In parallel, 15 healthy controls were tested. METH abusers had lower D2R availability in caudate than in controls. Both METH abusers and controls showed decreased striatal D2R availability after MPH and these decreases were smaller in METH than in controls in left putamen. The six METH abusers who relapsed during the follow-up period had lower D2R availability in dorsal striatum than in controls, and had no D2R changes after MPH challenge. The 10 METH abusers who completed detoxification did not differ from controls neither in striatal D2R availability nor in MPH-induced striatal DA changes. These results provide preliminary evidence that low striatal DA function in METH abusers is associated with a greater likelihood of relapse during treatment. Detection of the extent of DA dysfunction may be helpful in predicting therapeutic outcomes. Molecular Psychiatry (2012) 17, 918-925; doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.86; published online 12 July 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available