4.8 Article

A cooperative interaction between LPHN3 and 11q doubles the risk for ADHD

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 741-747

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2011.59

Keywords

ADHD; genetic interaction; LPHN3; NCAM1; DRD2

Funding

  1. Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. COLCIENCIAS [1115-04-12010, 1115-04-18083]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KFO 125/1-1, SFB 581]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In previous studies of a genetic isolate, we identified significant linkage of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to 4q, 5q, 8q, 11q and 17p. The existence of unique large size families linked to multiple regions, and the fact that these families came from an isolated population, we hypothesized that two-locus interaction contributions to ADHD were plausible. Several analytical models converged to show significant interaction between 4q and 11q (P< 1 x 10(-8)) and 11q and 17p (P< 1 x 10(-6)). As we have identified that common variants of the LPHN3 gene were responsible for the 4q linkage signal, we focused on 4q-11q interaction to determine that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) harbored in the LPHN3 gene interact with SNPs spanning the 11q region that contains DRD2 and NCAM1 genes, to double the risk of developing ADHD. This interaction not only explains genetic effects much better than taking each of these loci effects by separated but also differences in brain metabolism as depicted by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy data and pharmacogenetic response to stimulant medication. These findings not only add information about how high order genetic interactions might be implicated in conferring susceptibility to develop ADHD but also show that future studies of the effects of genetic interactions on ADHD clinical information will help to shape predictive models of individual outcome. Molecular Psychiatry (2012) 17, 741-747; doi:10.1038/mp.2011.59; published online 24 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available