4.8 Article

Interaction of prenatal exposure to cigarettes and MAOA genotype in pathways to youth antisocial behavior

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 928-937

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2009.22

Keywords

prenatal smoking; MAOA; gene x environment interaction; developmental psychopathology

Funding

  1. NIDA [DA15223]
  2. National Institute for Health Research [CSA/03/07/014] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic susceptibility to antisocial behavior may increase fetal sensitivity to prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke. Testing putative gene x exposure mechanisms requires precise measurement of exposure and outcomes. We tested whether a functional polymorphism in the gene encoding the enzyme monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) interacts with exposure to predict pathways to adolescent antisocial behavior. We assessed both clinical and information-processing outcomes. One hundred seventy-six adolescents and their mothers participated in a follow-up of a pregnancy cohort with well-characterized exposure. A sex-specific pattern of gene x exposure interaction was detected. Exposed boys with the low-activity MAOA 5' uVNTR (untranslated region variable number of tandem repeats) genotype were at increased risk for conduct disorder (CD) symptoms. In contrast, exposed girls with the high-activity MAOA uVNTR genotype were at increased risk for both CD symptoms and hostile attribution bias on a face-processing task. There was no evidence of a gene-environment correlation (rGE). Findings suggest that the MAOA uVNTR genotype, prenatal exposure to cigarettes and sex interact to predict antisocial behavior and related information-processing patterns. Future research to replicate and extend these findings should focus on elucidating how gene x exposure interactions may shape behavior through associated changes in brain function. Molecular Psychiatry (2010) 15, 928-937; doi:10.1038/mp.2009.22; published online 3 March 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available