4.8 Article

Cognitive impact of genetic variation of the serotonin transporter in primates is associated with differences in brain morphology rather than serotonin neurotransmission

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 512-522

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2009.90

Keywords

5-HTTLPR; serotonin transporter; polymorphism; cognition; development; rhesus macaque

Funding

  1. NARSAD
  2. NIH/NIAAA [014646]
  3. Office of Research and Development Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A powerful convergence of genetics, neuroimaging and epidemiological research has identified the biological pathways mediating individual differences in complex behavioral processes and the related risk for disease. Orthologous genetic variation in non-human primates (NHPs) represents a unique opportunity to characterize the detailed molecular and cellular mechanisms that bias behaviorally and clinically relevant brain function. We report that a rhesus macaque orthologue of a common polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene (rh5-HTTLPR) has strikingly similar effects on behavior and brain morphology to those in humans. Specifically, the rh5-HTTLPR (S)hort allele broadly affects cognitive choice behavior and brain morphology without observably affecting the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) transporter or 5-HT1A concentrations in vivo. Collectively, our findings indicate that 5-HTTLPR-associated behavioral effects reflect genotype-dependent biases in cortical development rather than static differences in serotonergic signaling mechanisms. Moreover, these data highlight the vast potential of NHP models in advancing our understanding of human genetic variation affecting behavior and neuropsychiatric disease liability. Molecular Psychiatry (2010) 15, 512-522; doi:10.1038/mp.2009.90; published online 1 September 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available