4.5 Article

Regulation of Motility in Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora: Quorum-Sensing Signal Controls FlhDC, the Global Regulator of Flagellar and Exoprotein Genes, by Modulating the Production of RsmA, an RNA-Binding Protein

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1316-1323

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-01-10-0017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Missouri

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora causes soft-rotting (tissue-macerating) disease in many plants and plant organs. Although pectinases are the primary determinants of virulence, several ancillary factors that augment bacterial virulence have also been identified. One such factor is bacterial motility. Flagellum formation and bacterial movement are regulated in many enterobacteria, including E. carotovora subsp. carotovora, by FlhDC, the master regulator of flagellar genes and FliA, a flagellum-specific a factor. We document here that motility of E. carotovora subsp. carotovora is positively regulated by the quorum-sensing signal, N-acylhomoserine lactone (AHL), and negatively regulated by RsmA, a post-transcriptional regulator. RsmA, an RNA-binding protein, causes translational repression and promotes RNA decay. Our data show that RsmA negatively regulates flhDC and fliA expression. Moreover, the chemical stabilities of transcripts of these genes are greater in an RsmA(-) mutant than in RsmA(+) bacteria. These observations contrast with positive regulation of ADC and motility by CsrA (= RsmA) in Escherichia coli. In the absence of AHL, the AHL receptors ExpR1/ExpR2 (= AhlR) in Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora negatively regulate motility and expression of ADC and fliA by activating RsmA production. In the presence of AHL, regulatory effects of ExpR1/ExpR2 are neutralized, resulting in reduced levels of rsmA expression and enhanced motility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available