4.5 Review

The role of auxins and cytokinins in the mutualistic interaction between Arabidopsis and Piriformospora indica

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1371-1383

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1371

Keywords

plant-microbe interaction; Sebacinaceae

Funding

  1. SFB 604
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Oe133/19-1]
  3. Bundesministerium fur Bildung and Forschung [IND 03/013]
  4. International Max-Planck Research School Jena
  5. Czech Ministry of Education [MSM 6198959216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arabidopsis growth and reproduction are stimulated by the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica. The fungus produces low amounts of auxins, but the auxin levels and the expression of auxin-regulated genes are not altered in colonized roots. Also, mutants with reduced auxin levels (ilr1-1, nit1-3, tfl2, cyp79 b2b3) respond to R indica. However, the fungus rescues the dwarf phenotype of the auxin overproducer sur1-1 by converting free auxin into conjugates, which also results in the downregulation of the auxin-induced IAA6 and the upregulation of the P indica-induced LRR1 gene. The fungus produces relatively high levels of cytokinins, and the cytokinin levels are higher in colonized roots compared with the uncolonized controls. trans-Zeatin cytokinin biosynthesis and the CRE1/AHK2 receptor combination are crucial for P indica-mediated growth stimulation, while mutants lacking cis-zeatin, impaired in other cytokinin receptor combinations, or containing reduced cytokinin levels respond to the fungus. Since root colonization is not affected in the cytokinin mutants, we propose that cytokinins are required for P indica-induced growth promotion. Finally, a comparative analysis of the phytohormone mutants allows the conclusion that the response to P indica is independent of the architecture and size of the roots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available