4.5 Article

The Genetic Network Controlling the Arabidopsis Transcriptional Response to Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola: Roles of Major Regulators and the Phytotoxin Coronatine

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1408-1420

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-21-11-1408

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOB-0419648]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service [2005-3531816197]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expression profiling of wild-type plants and mutants with defects in key components of the defense signaling network was used to model the Arabidopsis network 24 h after infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326. Results using the Affymetrix ATH1 array revealed that expression levels of most pathogen-responsive genes were affected by mutations in coi1, ein2, npr1, pad4, or sid2. These five mutations defined a small number of different expression patterns displayed by the majority of pathogen-responsive genes. P. syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 elicited a much weaker salicylic acid (SA) response than ES4326. Additional mutants were profiled using a custom array. Profiles of pbs3 and ndr1 revealed major effects of these mutations and allowed PBS3 and NDR1 to be placed between the EDS1/PAD4 node and the SA synthesis node in the defense network. Comparison of coi1, dde2, and jar1 profiles showed that many genes were affected by coi1 but very few were affected by dde2 or jar1. Profiles of coi1 plants infected with ES4326 were very similar to those of wild-type plants infected with bacteria unable to produce the phytotoxin coronatine, indicating that, essentially, all COI1-dependent gene expression changes in this system are caused by coronatine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available