4.7 Article

Diversification in the Andes: Age and origins of South American Heliotropium lineages (Heliotropiaceae, Boraginales)

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 90-102

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.001

Keywords

Andean orogeny; Boraginaceae; Neotropics; Tournefortia

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB 0415573253]
  2. CESAF (Chile)
  3. Fondecyt [11085016]
  4. US National Museum of Natural History
  5. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  6. European Community [GB-TAF-4514, ES-TAF-136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The uplift of the Andes was a major factor for plant diversification in South America and had significant effects on the climatic patterns at the continental scale. It was crucial for the formation of the arid environments in south-eastern and western South America. However, both the timing of the major stages of the Andean uplift and the onset of aridity in western South America remain controversial. In this paper we examine the hypothesis that the Andean South American groups of Heliotropium originated and diversified in response to Andean orogeny during the late Miocene and a the subsequent development of aridity. To this end, we estimate divergence times and likely biogeographical origins of the major clades in the phylogeny of Heliotropium, using both Bayesian and likelihood methods. Divergence times of all Andean clades in Heliotropium are estimated to be of late Miocene or Pliocene ages. At least three independent Andean diversification events can be recognized within Heliotropium. Timing of the diversification in the Andean lineages Heliotropium sects. Heliothamnus, Cochranea, Heliotrophytum, Hypsogenia, Plagiomeris, Platygyne clearly correspond to a rapid, late Miocene uplift of the Andes and a Pliocene development of arid environments in South America. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available