4.7 Article

Phylogenetic relationships between Hystrix and its closely related genera (Triticeae; Poaceae) based on nuclear Acc1, DMC1 and chloroplast trnL-F sequences

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 327-335

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.005

Keywords

Hytrix; Leymus; Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (Acc1); Disrupted meiotic cDNA (DMC1); Chloroplast trnL-F; Phylogeny; Polyploid

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30670150, 30870154]
  2. Excellent Doctoral Dissertation Fund of Sichuan Agricultural University [YBPY0803]
  3. Science and Technology Bureau and Education Bureau of Sichuan Province, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To estimate the phylogenetic relationship of polyploid Hystrix in Triticeae, two single-copy nuclear genes (Acc1 and DMC1) and chloroplast trnL-F sequences of six Hystrix taxa were analyzed with those of nine Leymus species (NsXm), four Elymus species (StH) and 13 diploid taxa from seven monogenomic genera. Phylogenetic analyses reveal that Hystrix taxa contain two distinct types of genome constitution, despite the overall morphological and ecological similarity among Hystrix taxa. One type of genome constitution is StH (Hy. patula) as Elymus, the other is NsXm (Hy. californica, Hy. coreana, Hy. duthiei, Hy. duthiei ssp. longearistata and Hy. komarovii) as Leymus. The St, H and Ns genomes in Hystrix are donated by Pseudoroegneria, Hordeum and Psathyrostachys, respectively. The donor of the Xm genome is closely related to Agropyron (P). The trnL-F data especially indicate that there has been a maternal haplotype polymorphism in Hystrix species. Based on these results, we suggest that Hy. coreana, Hy. duthiei, Hy. duthiei ssp. longearistata, Hy. komarovii and Hy. californica should be included in the genus Leymus, and Hy. patula in the genus Elymus. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available