4.7 Article

Controlling Release of Metformin HCl through Incorporation into Stomach Specific Floating Alginate Beads

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 2273-2281

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp2001395

Keywords

metformin hydrochloride; floating drug delivery; beads; aging effect; hypoglycemic activity

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of present study was to develop stomach specific floating beads of metformin hydrochloride for effective management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The beads were evaluated for surface morphology, particle size, tapped density, true density, percent porosity, drug entrapment efficiency, percent yield, differential scanning calorimetry, in vitro floating ability and in vitro drug release. Stability studies were performed at 25 and 40 degrees C up to 45 days. Effectiveness of the formulations was evaluated in vivo by hypoglycemic response in both normal and diabetic albino rats. The beads were grossly spherical in shape, and average particle diameter of beads was found to be in the size range of 861.34 to 991.75 mu m. Percent entrapment was found to be in the range of 77.61 to 82.48%. Beads demonstrated favorable in vitro floating ability. All the formulations followed a non-Fickian release mechanism. It was found that there was no significant effect on floating ability of aged beads since it floated up to an 8 h study period. In vivo studies on diabetic rats showed that the hypoglycemic effect induced by the metformin hydrochloride loaded alginate beads was significantly greater (P < 0.05) and more prolonged than that induced by the nonfloating beads. The results clearly demonstrated the ability of the formulation to maintain blood glucose level and improved the patient compliance by enhancing, controlling and prolonging the systemic absorption of metformin hydrochloride.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available