4.7 Article

Nanoemulsion Preparations of the Anticancer Drug Dacarbazine Significantly Increase Its Efficacy in a Xenograft Mouse Melanoma Model

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 1055-1063

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp8000556

Keywords

Nanoemulsion; xenograft; melanoma; Dacarbazine; cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports on the preparation of a water-soluble nanoemulsion of the highly lipid-soluble drug Dacarbazine (DAC). In addition, relative to suspensions of DAC, the nanoemulsion preparation demonstrated a lower zeta-potential (decreased negative charge, less anionic and more cationic) which has previously been associated with influencing drug membrane permeability. This study also reports that, relative to suspensions of DAC with a mean particle size of 5470 nm, nanoemulsions of DAC having mean particle sizes of 131 nm were more efficacious. For example, in a mouse xenograft model using a human melanoma cell line, a topical application of nanoemulsions of DAC compared to the suspension preparation of DAC produced up to 10-fold greater percent (%) reductions of tumor size. The reduction in tumor size by the intramuscular (IM) injection (-61%) and topical application of the nanoemulsion preparations of DAC (-49%) appeared to be comparable in efficacy, although the former was statistically greater (p < 0.05). In addition, 12 weeks after DAC treatment cessation, 98% of the animals given the IM application of the nanoemulsion of DAC remained tumor-free compared to the control or untreated animals. During this drug cessation period, and compared to the suspension preparations, nanoemulsions of DAC showed 5-fold greater efficacies (73% versus 14%) in preventing tumor growth. In conclusion, in this xenograft mouse model of melanoma, nanoemulsion suspensions of DAC are more efficacious in the treatment and prevention of tumor growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available