4.7 Article

Prognostic value of Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy

Journal

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 102-111

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2008.01.004

Keywords

Bcl-2; Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Doxorubicin; Apoptosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Argentine, CONICET [PIP 5149]
  2. Argentine Foundation for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have analyzed the predictive/prognostic value of Bcl-2 protein in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. one hundred and ten patients were submitted to two different chemotherapeutic regimens: a) 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin or epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC/FEC) during 2-6 cycles before surgery and 3 or 4 additional cycles of FAC/FEC after surgery (n = 40) and b) doxorubicin (D) 75 mg/m(2) or epirubicin (E) 120 mg/m(2) during 4 cycles before surgery, and 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) after surgery (n = 70). Bcl-2 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemistry, did not change significantly after chemotherapy and was not related to clinical/pathological response. In FAC/FEC group, Bcl-2 positive expression after chemotherapy correlated with better disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001). In D/E group, Bcl-2 also correlated with better DFS and OS (P = 0.03 and P = 0.054) in the post-chemotherapy biopsies. An unusual nuclear localization of Bax was observed in some biopsies, but this localization did not correlate with the tumor response or outcome of the patients. We found that a high Bcl-2 expression had no predictive value but had prognostic value in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy. (C) 2008 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available